Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Week 7 - Final Thoughts About Inquiry-Based Learning

This course has helped me develop a new understanding of inquiry-based learning. When this course first started, my knowledge of inquiry learning was limited to thinking it was just asking questions. As the weeks progressed, I have learned that there is much more than questioning in an inquiry-based learning environment. Inquiry learning also includes a focus on abilities and understandings along with process skills that play an important role in this type of learning environment.

In the beginning of this course, I learned that inquiry-based learning requires active learning and teaching. Building community in the classroom is an important part of any inquiry learning environment. Students need to feel safe, know they can take risks, and that their opinions are valued. Expectations need to be established early on and modeled by the teacher. Students also need to know that failure is okay and that second chances will be given.

As the weeks progressed, my idea of instruction and student engagement changed. This course provided examples of different types of inquiry learning, from teacher-directed to teacher-student shared to student-direct. There is no right or wrong way to practice inquiry learning. Flexibility in instruction and curriculum in this type of learning environment is key to making inquiry learning successful.

This course gave me the opportunity to explore several web 2.0 tools that foster inquiry. There are technology tools that can be used in each phase of the 5E instructional model to gauge student knowledge and understandings, engage students in their learning, and to assess what students have learned. I also learned about formative and summative assessments and how to use web 2.0 tools to assess students.

The last few weeks of the course provided me with the chance to create an inquiry-based lesson and unit plan that I will be able to use with my students. By doing this, I learned about the 5E’s of inquiry – engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. Through the creation of the lesson plan using the 5E model, I was able to practice Backward Design.

I do hope to implement various inquiry strategies into my own classes or classes that I co-teach. I had mentioned in a previous blog post that I did not know how to assess students in an inquiry-based learning environment. I now know that using rubrics to assess students is a direction I would like to take in my classes. In addition, I plan on continuing to use technology in my classes, but I want to make these technology-based assignments more inquiry focused. I would also like to look over lessons I teach and see what changes I can make so they are more student-directed.

I am very pleased with everything I have learned in this course. The knowledge I gained has helped me grow as an educator. I’m excited to start implementing inquiry learning into my classes.

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Week 6 - Thoughts and Reflection

I feel my understanding of inquiry-based learning is constantly changing and developing as the weeks progress. I really enjoyed this week’s readings and discussions. I appreciated having the opportunity to start applying all that I’ve learned by creating a lesson plan and developing ways to incorporate web 2.0 tools into the 5E model. Overall, this was a fun week for me!

This week started with the Backward Design Model. Wiggins and McTighe created the design framework, Understanding By Design, which focuses on educators asking ourselves what students should know, understand, or be able to do at the end of the lesson or unit of study (Topic A: Understanding Backward Design, 2020). Learning about this model was a good reminder that I need to be intentional about what I want my students to learn and be able to do before I start any instruction.

As mentioned above, this week I also learned about the 5E’s of inquiry – engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation (Topic B: The 5E – An Instructional Model, 2020). All of these phases involve the engagement of students in their own learning, which is an important part of an inquiry-based learning environment – students are at the center of their learning. Through the creation of a lesson plan using the 5E model, I was able to practice Backward Design. I tried my best to get students engaged in meaningful learning for each phase of the 5E’s.

Lastly, this week ended with web 2.0 tools and how they can be used to enhance formative assessments. As I noted last week, I have been using web 2.0 tools in my own classes for some time now and it is a topic that I feel very comfortable with. This week provided me with the opportunity to better see how web 2.0 tools can enhance learning and inquiry. I learned this week that I need to show my students the best web 2.0 tools they can use to answer questions.

After this week, I feel I have a better grasp on how to foster inquiry-based learning in the classroom through lessons and web 2.0 tools. Now that I’ve created an inquiry-based lesson and used web 2.0 tools to assess learning, the questions I still have are:
1.     Does inquiry learning work well if the lesson needs to be split over a few days?
2.     What does grading look like in an inquiry-based learning environment?


References
Wilkes University (2020). Unit 6, Topic A: Understanding Backward Design. In EDIM 513: Inquiry Based Learning: Spring 2020 [Course content]. Retrieved from

Wilkes University (2020). Unit 6, Topic B: The 5E – An Instructional Model. In EDIM 513: Inquiry Based Learning: Spring 2020 [Course content]. Retrieved from

Wednesday, April 1, 2020

Week 5 - Thoughts and Reflection

These last two weeks have really been a time of growth for me in regards to my understanding of inquiry-based learning.

Last week, we learned about facts and concepts and how their connectedness is essential when developing inquiry-based lessons. Facts are isolated pieces of information that are detailed and concepts are the connections between pieces of information. Students need to first understand the facts before they can understand concepts to their full extent (Topic B: Facts vs. Concepts, 2020).

The card activity where we had to read the statements and decide if the statement was a fact or a concept was very challenging for me. Some statements were very obvious, and others proved to be more difficult, leaving me to make a guess. Even though this activity was hard, I’m glad we had to complete it because it gave me a better understanding of the difference between the two and helped me to understand how they are interconnected.

Week four introduced another new topic for me – investigable and non-investigable questions. Like the fact and concepts topic, this topic also proved to be challenging for me. I am still not sure I have a firm grasp on the difference between the two. My current understanding is that investigable questions can be tested and non-investigable questions cannot be answered through hands-on action or experiment (Topic D: Understanding Question Types, 2020). In addition, students need to realize that it is possible to change non-investigable questions to investigable questions.

This week was all about web 2.0 tools – a topic I finally know something about! I’ve been using web 2.0 tools with my students for a few years now, but this week I learned that inquiry-based learning can be enhanced through the use of these tools. With this new knowledge, I need to be more aware of how my students are being engaged in inquiry while using technology.

Some questions I still have about inquiry-based learning:
1.     How do I help my students create questions to investigate on their own?
2.     How can I differentiate inquiry-based learning?


References
Wilkes University (2020). Unit 4, Topic B: Facts vs. Concepts. In EDIM 513: Inquiry Based Learning: Spring 2020 [Course content]. Retrieved from

Wilkes University (2020). Unit 4, Topic D: Understanding Question Types. In EDIM 513: Inquiry Based Learning: Spring 2020 [Course content]. Retrieved from